As with any quadragenarian, a watchful eye must be kept on that which they call “stuff.” By stuff, they mean the effectiveness of the pitches in a pitcher’s repertoire. We only saw 5 innings of John Smoltz on Sunday, and from my seat in section 126 near the left foul pole, he certainly looked great, but perhaps a closer look should be taken to see if Smoltz’ stuff is what it was last year, when he was among the league’s best pitchers. We’ll do that with the Pitch f/x system, which uses two cameras to trace every single pitch’s movement and speed from the pitcher’s hand to the plate. 2008 is the first year which sees every single stadium equipped with Pitch f/x equipment, and it’s a scouting dream. Let’s get right to it, shall we?
Smoltz’ Fastball
Velocity - Last year, it mostly hung between 93 and 95, and yesterday was more of the same, and it came very close to hitting 96. His low speed was 88.7 and he topped out at 95.8. Most were between 91-94, which is about right for Smoltzie.
Movement - A fastball should “rise” about 10 inches if it has good movement. Now, thanks to gravity it won’t actually rise 10 inches, but that’s the effect the batter sees. To a batter, a fastball will have some upward hop. Smoltz had great movement on his fastball all day. He threw 10 fastballs that topped 10 inches in vertical movement. 6 of those were taken for a strike. Another was swung at and missed. The other 3 were balls. Either way, when Smoltz gets that nasty fastball movement, batters want no part of it. All in all, Smoltz threw 27 pitches which Pitch F/X classified as regular fastballs. Batters swung at 13 of those 27 pitches. 6 were fouled off, 4 were whiffs, and only 3 were put into play, resulting in one hit. 27 fastballs, 1 hit, which was Johan Santana’s bloop double. Not bad.
Command - This has more to do with Smoltz’ placement than the movement of the ball. Think about Daniel Cabrera of Baltimore. If movement and velocity is all you need, Daniel Cabrera would need a cabinet for his Cy Young Awards. You need command, though. Of his 27 fastballs, 20 were strikes. When he missed, it wasn’t by much. The fastball was on target.
Smoltz’ Slider
Velocity - Smoltz’ slider normally is in the high 80’s, occasionally even hitting the low 90’s. Yesterday was mostly the same, as the slider sat around 87-88 mph. Another good indication of solid arm strength, something we worried about with his shoulder problems.
Movement - #29’sbig ol’ hard slider was normal yesterday, with good hop and slight movement away from right handed hitters. Smoltz doesn’t throw the typical sliders that you see sweeping across the plate. His look like a slower fastball that have a small but sharp dive at the end. It’s very tough to do anything with the slider. No one got a hit with one yesterday. There were 10 swings on sliders- 4 fouls, 3 whiffs, and 3 hit into play, all for outs.
Command - Smoltz threw 26 sliders and 16 were taken. 10 were balls, 6 were strikes. That’s not a big deal. The slider is thrown when ahead in the count and usually as a chase pitch. By looking at the data, Smoltz kept the slider in a fairly small range of coordinates, so his command was good.
Smoltz’ Other Pitches
He didn’t throw enough, really, to give us a solid sample size, but here’s a quick review of what he did throw.
Changeup - He tossed 6, and they generally worked well. His changeup can sometimes get as much hop as his fastball, except at 85 mph, which is scary. It’s not a pitch he trusts too much, as evidenced by him only throwing 6, so his command may be off, but it’s a pitch that he can really work with if he needs to. He gave up one hit on a changeup, a Carlos Delgado single in the 4th.
Curveball - 6 curveballs yesterday, pure nastiness. One got away from him a little and was called for a ball, but 2 were swung at and missed, 2 were called strikes, and Luis Castillo managed to make contact with one in the 3rd for a fly out. Very impressive and if Smoltz can keep his command up, I think this could be a very underrated pitch. He doesn’t get great drop on it, though, and that’s probably why he uses it so rarely. If batters planned for it, it’d be much more hittable. However, because he uses it sparingly, it can clearly surprise those who are looking for a fastball or a slider.
Splitter - Batters were hitless yesterday against 7 splitters, and Smoltz’ command wasn’t too sharp. It ran inside to RHB most of the day, and most were called balls. Two were hit for outs, including the liner that Kotsay doubled up Carlos Delgado on.
Pitches Smoltz rarely throws - Smoltz threw two sinking motion fastballs yesterday, which is unusual for him. One was fouled off by Beltran in the 1st inning, the other fouled off by Church in the 4th. Also, there was one cut fastball, something I’m not used to seeing from Smoltz. It might have been an accident or a momentary Pitch F/X lapse, but it ran toward lefties slightly, which is opposite from his regular 4 seamer. It was called for a ball, whatever it was.
Conclusion - All in all, it doesn’t look like Smoltz’ stuff has lost any steam from 2007, which is good. That can sometimes happen. Look at Pedro Martinez over the years, for instance. However, Smoltz’ health is still clearly an issue. After all, that’s what limited him to 78 pitches yesterday. At least that’s all we have to worry about with our soon-to-be 40 year old. When he’s pitching, he’s as nasty as he wants to be. Smoltz was calculating, precise, and careful all the way to 5 shutout innings, 4 baserunners, and 6 strikeouts. For a 40 year old with shoulder troubles, that’s perfectly fine with me.
By the way, I thought I should also mention this:
FIRST PLACE!!!!!!1!
(yeah, it’s a tie with Florida, but it’s 1st place just the same. These games still count in October, y’know.)
NOTE: When I say the ball moves towards right handers, that doesn’t mean it couldn’t be inside to a lefty. Location and movement are different, and that should be kept in mind. Think about it this way - if you’re aiming a pitch, that’s one dimension. Then, the movement I’m talking about is the second effect that determines where the pitch winds up and what the batter sees. Also, Pitch f/x, for some reason or another, was unable to classify 5 pitches. Naturally, those weren’t included in the totals you read above. Also, it’s a relatively new system, and there are bound to be some kinks. However, what it offers is incredibly cool, especially in the world of scouting.



FYI on Smoltz. He stands at 2,981 career strikeouts, just 19 shy of joining 15 other big leaguers who are in the 3,000 K Club.
Of those who are eligible for the Hall of Fame, only Bert Blyleven is not a member. According to my friend Dave McMahon over at the SportsPageAtlanta.com, the reasoning Blyleven is not in the Hall is because he was simply viewed as a journeyman.
Other players not yet eligible for the Hall that are members of the 3,000 K Club include: Roger Clemens, Randy Johnson, Greg Madduz, Curt Schilling and Pedro Martinez.
Mike Mussina is next behind Smoltz in approaching the milestone at 2,663 (pitching tonight btw), and chances are at his age and ability he won’t reach 3,000 in my opinion.
Comment by Tanner — April 7, 2008 @ 3:51 pm
As someone who has read more on Blyleven than things I should be reading about, like Iraq, I really don’t think being a journeyman has anything to do with it. At least, that’s not what I think of when I think journeyman.
Blyleven pitched 6 1/2 seasons with the Twins, 1 1/2 years with the Rangers, 3 years with Pittsburgh, 4 1/2 with the Indians, 3 1/2 more with the Twins, and 3 with the Angels.
Compare that to Hall of Famer Gaylord Perry. 8 full seasons in San Francisco, 3 1/2 in Cleveland, 2 1/2 in Texas, 2 in San Diego, 1/2 in Texas, 1/2 in New York, 1 in Atlanta, 1 1/2 in Seattle, and 1/2 in Kansas City.
I don’t want this to turn into a Blyleven discussion, but he should be in the Hall. Here are his ranks:
Wins - 26th all time
Outs recorded - 13th all time
Strikeouts - 5th all time
Games Started - 11th all-time
Shutouts - 9th all-time
When it comes down to it, I think these are the reasons Blyleven isn’t in:
1. He didn’t win 300 games and that’s all writers can comprehend about a career of pitching.
2. He didn’t win any awards, and writers love patting themselves on the back by picking their own former winners to be in the Hall.
3. He didn’t win 300 games.
4. Blyleven couldn’t win 13 more games by himself.
5. He’s Dutch. Just kidding. It’s actually b/c he’s Dutch AND he didn’t win 300 games.
On Mussina: I agree - he won’t reach 3000, but I’m glad you mentioned him. He’s had a great career and would get a vote from me for the Hall of Fame. I think his career kind of gets lost in the midst of the better guys of his era, and that’s for good reason, but just because you’re not as good as Clemens or Maddux or Johnson, it doesn’t mean you aren’t as good as Don Sutton, Gaylord Perry, or Jim Palmer.
Finally, good call on Smoltzie being so close, which I didn’t realize. I was at FulCo in 1996 when he notched #2000. Smoltz won’t win 300, but he should be a HOF-er too. Then again, the voters may not look past the win column to figure out whether to vote for him. Hopefully they won’t be as short-sighted with him.
Comment by BBlackwell — April 7, 2008 @ 4:29 pm
Smoltz drinks your milkshake! HE DRINKS IT UP!!!!!
Comment by bstarter29 — April 7, 2008 @ 5:38 pm
Also, I was wrong about his 2000th. It came in 1999 at home against Tampa Bay. It was his 1500th that I witnessed, or at least I thought:
For some reason, the scoreboard went off in that ‘96 game announcing Smoltz’ 1500th K, but he actually had gotten it the previous start in Chicago. I suddenly feel cheated. I even had photographic evidence (somewhere) of that 1500th K, but now it’s not even accurate. I wonder what was up with the stat keepers back then, and why the error was made.
Comment by BBlackwell — April 7, 2008 @ 6:43 pm
Excellent article. I really enjoyed reading that.
Where did you find the depth of information from the F/x system? I’m fascinated by pitchers and their movements and inning to inning adjustments and would love to be able to read more.
Also, Brandon Isleib, a writer for the Hard Ball Times and SpotnStripe, wrote a really detailed article about Blyleven and why he deserves to be in the hall of fame. Here is a link to his article from the HBT.
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/sir-bert-the-obscure/
Comment by SpotnStripe — April 7, 2008 @ 7:54 pm
I got the data raw and worked with it myself. MLB makes all the data available in (clearly) a timely fashion, and you can access it here:
http://gd2.mlb.com/components/game/mlb/
Once you get to the page for the single pitcher - and it’s kind of tough to figure out which pitcher is which - save the page as an XLS page and then open it with Excel. When it comes to Pitch F/X data, Josh Kalk and Joe Sheehan are really the two guys to read, but I did my best with a single game. Thanks for the comment.
Comment by BBlackwell — April 7, 2008 @ 8:21 pm
Yeah, I wasn’t trying to say Blyleven shouldn’t be in, I agree that he should. I was just pointing out that he wasn’t, and I didn’t do enough research to figure out why exactly, so I just asked someone with more knowledge of it than me.
I don’t think Smoltz will be looked over for the Hall because his time as a closer is well noted. Even if Smoltz’s years as a closer where actually as a starter, he probably still wouldn’t reach 300 wins. That’s debatable. But the fact that he’s the first pitcher in the history of the game to follow a 40 save season with a 200+ inning season will actually be a factor. A handful of stats like that, along with the handful of awards he’s won will get him in.
I don’t know how much people have thought about it, but I’d like to see Smoltz, Glavine and Maddux all retire in the same season. That way they could all get into the Hall together. That would be a Cooperstown trip worth making.
Comment by Tanner — April 8, 2008 @ 11:23 am
Tanner -
That would be very cool if they all went in together, although I worry for Smoltz’ chances if he went up in the vote against them. Writers have this weird thing where they think a “first-ballot” HOFer is different from a third or fourth ballot HOFer. The Hall is the Hall. That whole idea is silly. Vote for a guy if he deserves it, don’t if he doesn’t.
Also, a random Bert Blyleven fact for the day, and probably the most important of all. He finished with 287 wins, and 13 more would’ve gotten him in the Hall pretty easily. Some claim that had he been a big game pitcher, he could’ve willed his team to victory. Blyleven pitched 46 games where he went at least 8 innings, gave up 2 runs or less, and didn’t get the win. FORTY-SIX!!!
Ok, I’m done on that topic for now. I think your points about Smoltz are excellent and they make my fears go away just a little. For a while I really worried that he wouldn’t get in.
Comment by BBlackwell — April 8, 2008 @ 4:29 pm