July 10, 2008

Buy or Sell?

Filed under: General — BBlackwell @ 3:49 pm

The Atlanta Braves are in a tough situation.  They’re 6 games under .500 and dealing with injuries across the board.  Several stars the team was depending on are underperforming and there’s no fire in this team’s belly.

But on the other hand, the Braves are only 6 games away from 1st place and only 8 games away from the Wild Card spot.  If they’ve managed to stay this close with such a trying and, at times, miserable first half of the season, the 2nd half can’t get much worse, can it?  So, in the last few weeks before the July 31 trading deadline, what should Atlanta do?

At 43-49, it’s easy to write this team off as an also-ran that will plummet in the season’s waning months.  However, that 43-49 doesn’t really tell the whole story.  A popular story that has been negatively spun all over Atlanta is the team’s record in one-run games.  Now, for all practical purposes, let me just tell you that the team’s record in one-run games is mostly meaningless.  In many of these games, the team was down by multiple runs only to score late in the game to bring it closer.  It doesn’t mean the team is poorly managed, unclutch, or whatever other attribute you can conjure up.  What you can take from the one-run game record is actually something positive, and when you think about it, it’s the mark of a team that is tough to beat:  when the Braves win, they win big, but when they lose, they barely lose.  When you’ve got a chance to win in nearly every game, that’s a good thing.  It’s not as psychological as the mainstream media would have you believe.  It really is some terrible luck. Throughout baseball history, looking at runs scored and runs allowed can, most of the time, accurately predict what a team’s record will be.  The Braves right now have an expected winning % of .538, which would put the team’s record at either 49-43 or 50-42.  What does this mean?  Even though the standings don’t reflect it, the team has played well enough to be in 1st place right now.

I know what you’re thinking; this is all well and good for imaginary baseball, but how does this knowledge help the team get to the playoffs in 2008?  Put simply, it lets the team know that natural improvement may be on the way.  This has happened in baseball before. In 2005, Houston, at the same point, was piddling around at 46-46.  They were 5 games out of a playoff spot.  However, their expected record was 48-46, and more importantly, one of the teams they trailed, the Washington Nationals at 54-40, had an expected record of only 46-48 at the time.  The Astros didn’t bail on their aging team, and they kept fighting.  From that point through the end of the season, the Astros were the NL’s best team, winning 42 of their final 69 games.  The Nationals, on the other hand, plummeted quickly finishing on a 27-41 run as the NL’s worst team.

Sometimes it doesn’t turn around.  The Diamondbacks eluded the cold hard facts last year and made the playoffs while giving up more runs than they scored.  But most of the time, it does balance out.  The Marlins are a team that’s a prime candidate to stumble badly.  The Brewers were headed for a similar fate, but they made the right trade at the right time to try to save themselves.

Am I saying the Braves will reach the playoffs?  No.  They probably won’t.  But that doesn’t mean they can’t, and much, much stranger things have happened in baseball.  The East is still a very winnable division, so now isn’t the time to start bailing on Atlanta’s chances.  Atlanta shouldn’t be a strong buyer this July, because the division is a bit of a long shot, but if there’s any way the team can improve while keeping its top prospects, the Braves should be looking for a trade.  Another arm to stabilize the bullpen, an innings eater in the rotation, or a left field bat would and should all interest the Braves, if the price is right.  At the All-Star break, I’ll get a little more specific on the Braves’ options in this trade market.  For now, I’m just hoping they ignore that ringing phone, because history points to a quick turnaround.

« Game 92   Game 93 »

1 Comment »

  1. BBlackwell: Good post. I agree with you that baseball history is chock full of teams that have taken off in the second half. While the 5-22 record in one-run games is frustrating beyond comprehension, it does show this team has been in games all season long. Just need to close the door on some of them.

    Geography helps, too. Were the Braves in four of the other five divisions, they’d be out of it and ready to sell. But in the middling NL East, where being average reigns surpreme, 84 or 85 victories might be enough to win the division. And the Braves HAVE to play better in the second half … or one would think.

    Gonna play the IF game here for a minute, but IF the young pitchers can avoid hitting the wall innings-wise, and Francoeur plays like the Francoeur we saw in 2005, 2006 and 2007, and Gonzalez continues owning the ninth, and Kotsay stays healthy and Blanco continues settling in at the leadoff spot, then this team figures to grab a few more wins in the late and close games it’s for the most part let slip away so far. Had the Braves just won FIVE of those one-run games they lost, they’d be 48-44 and tied with the Mets and Fish at 1 1/2 games back.

    It won’t take much to get back near first place. The next nine games, starting tonight in San Diego, are critical in making that happen, though. After those nine games, the Braves should have a better feel for what to do at the deadline. Go 7-2 or 2-7, and the buy or sell decision is easy. After those nine games, the Braves then go to Philly for three. Need to play well the next two and a half weeks, for that stretch is going to determine if they go for it or start looking toward 2009.

    Good blog. Enjoyed reading it. Will have to add this to my daily reading list.

    Bud.
    http://braves.today.com

    Comment by Bud — July 11, 2008 @ 9:10 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML ( You can use these tags): <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .